Cause-Related Marketing Vs. Tactical Philanthropy
Cause-Related Marketing Vs. Tactical Philanthropy
Blog Article
Even in our quick times of digital media and words at the speed of idea, a good old newspaper headline can still get your attention. More on that in a minute. First a context.
One senior guy in our small town told me a story just recently about how he had actually when extended credit to a fellow with no visible methods who required to buy groceries for his family. The arrangement was struck on a handshake. Amongst people with honor, that was enough. "He paid me back every red cent," my friend stated.
Another concern is I remain in the occupation of lease choices in Las Vegas, NV. Therefore, for a choice the tenant/buyer (not the actual end buyer at the time the contract is signed) is putting down at least $2000. I would ask the same on an option in the mid-west even though the price point of the home is lower. This would suggest a bigger portion of a deposit. Therefore, somebody putting down $1000 to buy a home is not as productive as a lease option. And you lose control of the house.
You can get your kids or spouses included and create your own account title. I know households who have semi-annual conferences with their kids and grandkids to talk about where the grants need to go. What a great way to present philanthropy to kids!
Now, the momentum was building. (Just like those waves out in the ocean!) The spirit of enjoyable and enjoyment more info and the energy invested in raising the money was truly capturing on. The school's principal chose to take it up a notch and raised the total up to $500. And she accepted start too!
But if you're taking cash from the federal government, you can't keep an eye on it. and that's the No. 1 reason a federal bailout of papers is a dreadful idea. If there were a screening mechanism, even. a type of buffer board in between to protect the journos from the politicos. it doesn't take much imagination to imagine a time when a congressperson or staffer or bureaucrat will put the pressure on behind the scenes to obtain favorable protection or stave off negative coverage, utilizing the hazard of a curtailed subsidy. Newspapers would forfeit whatever shred of public trust they have staying.
Did the earthquake do it? No, Rhodes had actually reconstructed after the earthquake (although they didn't change the colossus). What brought Rhodes down was no earthquake or natural disaster or war or starvation. It was Roman tax policy. All to prevent a 2% tax. The Switzerland of the ancient world, the industrial giant of the east was brought down because people wished to avoid a 2% tax.